Health Care October 21, 2007
Posted by Ian in policy.trackback
Question about health care: Would government health care (eg. Canada’s) work better (ie. be less expensive) if people were forced to pay for part of the cost of their treatment if the person’s behaviour was directly responsible for their illness? Is there any place in the world where this is done?
[...] more here No Comments so far Leave a comment RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI [...]
[...] came across this post – <b>Health</b> Care – and thought it was worth sharing. I hope you find it interesting too and take the time to read [...]
Instead of denying people care because of someone else’s pre-conceived judgements about how people live their lives (which may or may not consider social and health inequities that contribute to poor health, or based on evidence for that matter), how about considering a re-orientation of health care away from the focus on acute care, to preventive/community-based care, so that instead of making them sick, people’s “lifestyles” incorporate healthy habits that drastically reduce systemic costs over the long term?
To answer your other question, I think the UK may have been considering several taxes for people with “unhealthy lifestyles”.
The costs of health care will never go down so long as the acute care model of health care is in place – equipment, pharmaceuticals, physician fees, expensive procedures – which only addresses problems once they present themselves will always be far more expensive than spending money to prevent them in the first place. And charging people extra for their “lifestyle” illnesses is not the answer. It only serves to further marginalize, and exacerbate negative determinants of health for, those getting sick in the first place.
Take a look at the Ottawa, Jakarta and Bangkok Charters to get a feel for what I mean.